Who Gets to Be a Judge Now? The Military Decides
Egypt Security Sector Report
This week’s report leads with the transfer of judicial recruitment and promotion to the Military Academy, a major escalation in the militarization of state power that has triggered rare judicial backlash. I then cover Sisi’s Davos appearance, his meeting with Trump, Cairo’s embrace of the “Board of Peace,” and the silence after Israeli strikes killed three Palestinian journalists linked to the Egyptian Gaza relief committee. I close with a regional and security roundup spanning Trump’s return to the GERD file, Saudi-Emirati fallout, continued mass jailing of journalists, prison deaths, US military projects, refugee raids, forced deportations, and deadly migrant smuggling routes from Libya.
Military Vetting Comes for the Bench
Presidential orders delivered in mid-January would transfer the testing and selection of new judges and prosecutors to the Egyptian Military Academy, stripping judicial bodies of powers they have long treated as the institutional core of “judicial independence.” According to reporting by Mada Masr and Matsada2sh, the orders were delivered in a meeting chaired by presidential office chief Omar Marwan and framed as immediate and non-negotiable. The move triggered rare, open anger inside judicial circles, raising the prospect of a direct confrontation between the bench and the executive.
That anger was formalized on 21 January 2026, when hundreds of judges from across the country packed the Judges Club headquarters in Cairo, in what participants described as the largest such gathering since 2013. Judges were informed by members of the Supreme Judicial Council that Marwan had conveyed a decision to transfer judicial appointments and promotions to the Military Academy, abolish the appointments office at the public prosecutor’s bureau, and condition promotion on passing advanced military courses. While some judges pushed for immediate escalation, the meeting ultimately agreed to grant a two-week negotiation window, mandating a Judges Club delegation to seek talks with the presidency and the academy. An extraordinary general assembly was scheduled for Friday, 6 February 2026, should negotiations fail.
That tension was sharpened days later by the public circulation of a confidential memorandum listing 790 candidates from the 2022 cohort slated for appointment as assistant prosecutors. Approved by the Supreme Judicial Council on 31 December 2025, the document surfaced first on closed judicial forums before leaking more widely. Judicial sources stressed to Matsada2sh that the disclosure was deliberate and carefully timed.
The list overwhelmingly consisted of sons and daughters of judges, reflecting the long-standing corporatist structure through which the judiciary reproduces itself. This dominance was neither accidental nor controversial within judicial circles. What unsettled judges was not the exposure of favoritism, which they regard as an internal norm, but the fear that an externally imposed restructuring would now override those inherited guarantees.
Alongside judges’ children, the list also included a visible share of sons and daughters of senior police and military officers, underscoring the degree to which elite state institutions remain intertwined. Named candidates included Omar, son of Maj. Gen. Mohamed Abdel Aal Fouad Abu Aaid of the Ministry of Interior (MOI); Sherif, son of Maj. Gen. Mahmoud al-Gamassi, former Assistant Interior Minister for Guards Sector and former Deputy Director of the Police Academy; and Mohamed, son of Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Timour Moussa Abul Magd of the armed forces.
Also listed were Aya, daughter of Maj. Gen. Ayman Abdel Aziz Kishar, Assistant Director of Military Intelligence; Saher, son of Maj. Gen. Abdel Wahab Abdel Rahim al-Sheikh, Assistant Interior Minister for the Documentation Sector; Mohamed, son of Maj. Gen. Khaled Moussa Abdel Fattah al-Barawi, former Alexandria Security Director; and Mazen, son of Maj. Gen. Wael Mohamed Abdel Fattah al-Ashwah, Damietta Security Director. Further names included Leila, daughter of Maj. Gen. Amr Abdel Khaleq Yassin al-Khouli of Homeland Security; Mohamed, son of police Maj. Gen. Faisal Saif al-Nasr al-Maqrih; Mohamed, son of Brig. Gen. Hisham Mohamed Lotfi al-Fakhrani of the military judiciary; Youssef, son of Maj. Gen. Amr Mostafa Hussein Hosni Yassin of Homeland Security; and Nour al-Din, son of Maj. Gen. Ashraf Diaa al-Din Mahmoud al-Bayoumi, Director of the Military Technical College.
Judicial sources emphasized to Matsada2sh that the leak was not meant to shame the judiciary, but to preempt responsibility. Coming one day after the Judges Club meeting, it functioned as a signal that the Supreme Judicial Council had completed its legal role. Any freezing, cancellation, or restructuring of the 2022 cohort would therefore be imposed from outside the judiciary, not decided within it. In effect, the disclosure drew a line of accountability just as that line was about to be erased.
Under the new proposed model, the Military Academy becomes both the entry point and the final gatekeeper. Candidates would begin with medical, physical, and psychological screening, height and weight checks, and security vetting inside the academy. Only after passing these stages would they sit legal exams administered by the Supreme Judicial Council’s “committee of seven,” with scores then sent back to the academy for final ranking before presidential ratification. What appears as a procedural reshuffle is in fact a decisive reordering: security clearance and bodily “fitness” precede legal competence.
The move is the latest phase in a broader militarization of civilian governance that has accelerated since 2023. The state has steadily relocated recruitment, screening, and professional socialization for civilian jobs away from ministries and into military institutions. In April 2023, a directive issued via the cabinet made completion of a Military Academy “qualification” course a prerequisite for appointment to a wide range of state posts, including judicial bodies. This shift hollowed out long-standing institutional boundaries separating civilian administration from the military establishment.
Within the judiciary, resistance to this process initially took the form of quiet accommodation rather than open confrontation. While judges expressed unease over the expansion of military oversight into appointments and training, disputes remained contained and procedural. That changed as the academy’s role expanded from initial training to career progression.
By January 2025, the academy had become a choke point not only for new appointees but also for advancement. Completion of military courses, accompanied by substantial fees, emerged as a de facto requirement for promotion. The consequences quickly became personal. Dozens of judges’ sons were disqualified during medical and athletic tests tied to military courses across the State Council, administrative prosecution, and public prosecution tracks. Anger spread through judicial circles as families discovered that academy screening, rather than legal merit (and their own nepotism network), now determined access to judicial careers.
Judges lobbied ministers, sought exemptions, and pressed for re-evaluations, particularly as the disqualifications coincided with internal Judges Club elections. The episode exposed growing resentment but also fragmentation: demands were pursued individually or through informal channels, not through sustained collective action. The dispute subsided without altering the academy’s role, reinforcing the sense that accommodation, not resistance, remained the dominant mode.
Seen in isolation, this might appear as a corporatist spat. But placed alongside the judiciary’s conduct in the recent electoral crises, it points to something deeper: growing tension and fragmentation inside the regime itself. Last November, during the parliamentary elections, courts were repeatedly thrust into open conflict with security agencies and executive authorities. Judges issued rulings halting elections, ordering re-runs, or invalidating results amid blatant interference by security bodies. In several instances, courts were slow-walked, ignored, or circumvented entirely by the executive, while judges themselves split over whether to press their rulings or retreat.
What links those electoral confrontations to the current dispute is not a sudden embrace of political pluralism, but anxiety over institutional erosion. In both cases, judges reacted most sharply when their role as procedural gatekeepers was threatened. The difference today is that the encroachment is no longer episodic, as in elections, but structural. It targets the judiciary’s ability to reproduce itself.
As Mahmoud Hamad has shown in his study of judges and generals in modern Egypt, the judiciary has long functioned as a partner in authoritarian rule, trading political acquiescence for control over appointments, promotions, and discipline. Courts supply legality and procedural cover; in return, they retain autonomy over their own ranks. Conflict arises not when rights are curtailed, but when this corporatist bargain is disturbed.
By relocating judicial recruitment and promotion to a military institution answerable to the commander in chief, the state crosses precisely that line. It inserts the security apparatus directly into the judiciary’s bloodstream, shaping who enters the bench and how careers advance. The fury over disqualified sons foreshadowed this moment. The January 2026 Judges Club meeting marks its escalation from personal grievance to institutional alarm.
Whether judges can convert that alarm into sustained resistance remains uncertain. A decade of repression has narrowed their room for maneuver, and the instinct to bargain remains strong. But by insisting on turning judicial gates into military checkpoints, the state is testing the one boundary the bench has historically defended most fiercely: control over who becomes a judge, and the status that control confers.
Revolutionary Journalism
Being mentioned in the same sentence as Claudia Jones is an honor I do not take lightly.
The Counterrevolution Against 25 January
On the anniversary of the 2011 Egyptian Revolution, I discuss its legacy and the impetus for my forthcoming book, Counterrevolution in Egypt.
Sisi at Davos
